Jump to content

Talk:Second Sino-Japanese War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former good article nomineeSecond Sino-Japanese War was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 22, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

Article needs more on broad geopolitics.

[edit]

This page needs more information on broad geopolitics instead of just military campaigns. For example Japanese capture of Amoy and Foochow is not mentioned because there was no military battle there. It's not only about the military campaigns. Alexysun (talk) 19:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

[edit]

Is there a good reason all the KMT commanders need two flags? Industrial Metal Brain (talk) 10:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imbecile's lament

[edit]

@Iallwayscomeback123, as the noted imbecile: the surrounding context is described well in prose, where it belongs. Like many other conflicts with timelines that are nuanced in this way, there is no need to problematize the date chosen by historians for our readers, or assume it is confusing as to require an explanatory footnote. It is merely needless clutter. Remsense ‥  08:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well thanks for the explanation, apologizes for the imbecile remark, it just seemed like dumb choice in my opinion but your augment makes sense. Iallwayscomeback123 (talk) 09:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! Remsense ‥  09:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent infobox bloat

[edit]

I've reverted the recemt massive bloat of casualty figures in the infobox. I am not sure these are the best ones to feature, but what we must not do in the infobox is feature all of them. Remsense ‥  02:43, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other belligerents

[edit]

From what I understand about the conflict, it makes sense to include the United States as a belligerent, but I don't think the same is true for the USSR. I'd appreciate others' thoughts. Remsense ‥  21:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]